Definition : Connectors - also called conjunctive words - are words that
link two similar elements in a sentence.
The main categories of connector are coordinating
conjunctions, such as and or or, and subordinating
conjunctions such as if, so that, because or while.
But it is also important to include conjunctive adverbs.
A small number of conjunctions and conjunctive adverbs can link individual words or phrases; but the majority can only link two clauses.
A small number of conjunctions and conjunctive adverbs can link individual words or phrases; but the majority can only link two clauses.
Essentially there are four types of
connectors:
4.
Conjunctive
adverbs such astherefore or however.
These are explained in part 2 of this topic: ► Conjunctive adverbs
These are explained in part 2 of this topic: ► Conjunctive adverbs
Most traditional grammars just repeat the established
classification of conjunctions as being either coordinating conjunctions or
subordinating conjunctions. This neat classification works in most cases, but
for some words it does not. Butand though can often be used as synonyms; yet butis listed as a
coordinator, and thoughas a subordinator.
Compare: He took part in the competition, but he did not win.
and : He took part in the competition, though he did not win.
Similarly, the old-fashioned "coordinator" for, has generally been replaced in modern English by asor by because, which are classed as subordinators.
Yet there is a real difference between butand though, and that is the way in which they are used. This suggests that the pertinent distinction between different types of conjunction is not actually one of function, but one of usage.
As for so, implying consequence, both David Crystal and Quirk, Greenbaum et.al. consider it as a subordinator; but many dictionaries and most Internet grammar sites, including Wikipedia, call it a coordinator. Coe, in the classic Learner's Grammar of English, carefully avoids calling it anything more than a conjunction.
For clarification of "so" see English grammar - so
Compare: He took part in the competition, but he did not win.
and : He took part in the competition, though he did not win.
Similarly, the old-fashioned "coordinator" for, has generally been replaced in modern English by asor by because, which are classed as subordinators.
Yet there is a real difference between butand though, and that is the way in which they are used. This suggests that the pertinent distinction between different types of conjunction is not actually one of function, but one of usage.
As for so, implying consequence, both David Crystal and Quirk, Greenbaum et.al. consider it as a subordinator; but many dictionaries and most Internet grammar sites, including Wikipedia, call it a coordinator. Coe, in the classic Learner's Grammar of English, carefully avoids calling it anything more than a conjunction.
For clarification of "so" see English grammar - so
Part 1. Conjunctions
Coordinating conjunctions are used to link two clauses
or phrases of equal value or equal status.
There are only a small number of coordinating conjunctions in English: most sources repeat what others say, and list the following seven, using the convenient acronym FANBOYS.
There are only a small number of coordinating conjunctions in English: most sources repeat what others say, and list the following seven, using the convenient acronym FANBOYS.
· and,
but, for, nor, or, soand yet.
It is perhaps preferable to exclude for,
and prefer the acronym BANYOS.
·
For can be forgotten, as it is hardly ever used as a
coordinating conjunction in modern English. It has been replaced by because or as....
which are clearly subordinators.
·
As for So, it
is a much disputed case. It is often called a coordinating conjunction, but not
all grammars agree on this, and so cannot at all be a
coordinating conjunction when it implies purpose. Many online
dictionaries and printed grammar books do not distinguish coherently between
the usage of sofor purpose and so for consequence,
or are very ambiguous on this point. So implying consequence is best defined as
a conjunctive adverb.
Andandor can link individual words or
clauses; yet, and but normally only link clauses,
but sometimes link two words. Nor cannot link words when it is
a coordinating conjunction it can only do so in partnership with neither,
as a correlative conjunction.
USAGE: Coordinating conjunctions give equal value to the two elements that they coordinate.
They must be placed between the two elements that they coordinate.
USAGE: Coordinating conjunctions give equal value to the two elements that they coordinate.
They must be placed between the two elements that they coordinate.
Can you start a
sentence with a conjunction?
A lot of grammar books claim
that it is wrong to start a sentence with a conjunction. This is just not true
! Most of the great writers in the English language have from time to time used
sentences starting with conjunctions. In the "King James" version
of the Bible, which was the standard English version of the Bible for three
hundred years, two of the first three sentences in the first chapter of the
book of Genesis start with And....
Examples:
I want three beers and a glass of
lemonade
He went to bed and went to sleep.
You can have the chocolate mousse or the lemon tart
They'll win, or they'll lose.
This present is not for Peter, but Paul
I bought a new dress that was not red but pink.
We're going to Paris, but not to Rome.
We're going to Paris, but we're also going to Rome.
He was very tired yet very happy.
The director was rather young, yet the company was successful.
He went to bed and went to sleep.
You can have the chocolate mousse or the lemon tart
They'll win, or they'll lose.
This present is not for Peter, but Paul
I bought a new dress that was not red but pink.
We're going to Paris, but not to Rome.
We're going to Paris, but we're also going to Rome.
He was very tired yet very happy.
The director was rather young, yet the company was successful.
Subordinating conjunctions are used to link two
clauses within a single sentence, when one clause is subordinate to the other.
In other words, the subordinate clause clarifies, expands or explains the meaning of the main clause.
Some types of subordinate clause are introduced by subordinating conjunctions, others (such as relative clauses) are not. Common subordinating conjunctions include
In other words, the subordinate clause clarifies, expands or explains the meaning of the main clause.
Some types of subordinate clause are introduced by subordinating conjunctions, others (such as relative clauses) are not. Common subordinating conjunctions include
· as
, because and since (cause)
· so and so that
(purpose)
· although and though (contrastive)
· after,
before, until, while, etc.
(temporal)
· if,
unless, as long as, provided, whenever, whatever (conditional, indirect question)
· that (reported speech, indirect statement,
consequential)
USAGE:
Subordinating conjunctions come at the start of the subordinate clause.
There are two sorts of subordinate clauses.
·
Most subordinate
clauses can come either before or after the main clause. So unlike
coordinating conjunctions, subordinating conjunctions can stand at the
start of a sentence.
·
but indirect
questions, relative clauses, and other subordinate clauses introduced by that, must normally be placed after the
main clause, just like a coordinated clause (Examples 12, 16 and 17)
·
So is a subordinating conjunction when it is used
to denote a purpose. A soclause denoting purpose does
not usually come before the main clause, but it is not impossible (example
6).
When so is used with the meaning of therefore or and
similarly , it is a conjunctive adverb.
A subordinate clause cannot stand alone: it needs a
main clause to complete the sentence.
Examples:
In these examples, it is not possible to invert the two clauses in sentences written in red
In these examples, it is not possible to invert the two clauses in sentences written in red
1.
I 'm going to
London because I've got a new job.
2.
Since it's
raining, I'm going to the cinema this afternoon.
3.
She didn't want
any more wine, as she'd already drunk enough.
4.
As she'd drunk
enough, she didn't take any more wine.
5.
I'm locking the
door, so nobody can get in
6.
So he wouldn't
forget to wake up, he set his alarm for 5.30.
7.
Although I love
him, I wouldn't want to marry him.
8.
This book is
good, though some bits of it are rather boring.
9.
After I finished
work, I went straight home.
10.
Until they
opened a new factory, they could not produce enough
11.
If you see anything
suspicious, let me know at once.
12.
He asked the
policeman if he knew of a good restaurant.
13.
Provided you can
swim, you can come out on our yacht.
14.
You can come out
on our yacht, as long as you can swim.
15.
I won't go
there, whatever he says.
16.
This ice-cream is so
good, that I'm going to have another one.
17.
The man said that he
was born in New York.
► See also more information on these pages :
These can either correlate words, or phrases, or
clauses (sentences).
The main examples are :
The main examples are :
· both....
and, not only.... but also, (combining
correlators)
· either...or
, whether.... or not (binary
choice correlators)
· neither....
nor, (negative correlators)
Other correlating pairs include: the more..... the more.....; no sooner.....
than... ; hardly ... than and a few others.
USAGE: With words and phrases, the coordinator normally has to precede the element it is correlating; when clauses are correlated, the coordinators either precede each correlated clause, or precede the verbs in these clauses. But these special cases should be noted:
USAGE: With words and phrases, the coordinator normally has to precede the element it is correlating; when clauses are correlated, the coordinators either precede each correlated clause, or precede the verbs in these clauses. But these special cases should be noted:
Both ... and can only correlate words, not clauses (Examples 1 - 3)
When not onlystarts a clause, the verb and subject of the first clause are inverted. (Example 4)
But also can be omitted, after not only (Example 6)
When nor introduces a clause, subject and auxiliary/modal verb are inverted. (Examples 16 - 18)
Neithercan be replaced by not or never in the first of two correlated clauses. (Example 18)
When no sooner or hardlyintroduce clauses, auxiliary and subject areinverted.
When not onlystarts a clause, the verb and subject of the first clause are inverted. (Example 4)
But also can be omitted, after not only (Example 6)
When nor introduces a clause, subject and auxiliary/modal verb are inverted. (Examples 16 - 18)
Neithercan be replaced by not or never in the first of two correlated clauses. (Example 18)
When no sooner or hardlyintroduce clauses, auxiliary and subject areinverted.
Examples:
1.
This is both stupid and incomprehensible.
2.
Both the president and the prime
minister were there.
3.
I can understand both his
reasons and his arguments.
4.
Not only can I hear him, but also I can
see him
5.
I can not
only hear him, but also see him.
6.
Not only can I hear him, I can see him (too).
7.
I bought not
only some blue suede shoes, but also a big cowboy
hat.
8.
It's either right or wrong.
9.
Either it's right, or it's wrong
10.
Either Mummy or Daddy will pick you up
after school.
11.
I'll go there whetheror
not I'm allowed to.
12.
I'll go there whether I'm
allowed to or not.
13.
We're going home
now, whether you like it or not.
14.
Neither Paul nor Mary could come to my
party.
15.
I'm neither angry nor happy.
16.
I neither like
that man, nor dislike him
17.
I neither like
that man; nor do I dislike him.
18.
I have never been
to Florida on holiday; nor have I been there on business.
19.
The more you earn, the more you spend.
20.
No soonerhad I opened the door, than the phone rang.
21.
Hardlyhad the plane taken off, than the pilot reported some trouble
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar